7.0 Accomplishments and Lessons
The accomplishments of many of these TMCs toward the implementation of selected integration strategies are noteworthy and reflect management’s recognition of the critical importance of weather to their operations and a strong motivation to better position their operations to take advantage of improved access to weather information.
7.1 Accomplishments and Outcomes
All these TMCs can point to a common set of important accomplishments achieved through their participation in the weather information integration program, as follows.
- Four comprehensive weather integration plans were prepared that serve not only to guide each TMCs future integration implementation efforts but also to offer clear examples for the benefit of other TMCs of weather integration across a range of strategies and under varying conditions.
- Each TMC established, through participation in the weather integration process, new partnerships, both internal and external to their agency that served to enhance their overall operations, provide benefit to the traveling public, and chart a pathway to improved working relationships in the future.
- TMCs acknowledged the importance of working closely with their counterparts in maintenance. Stronger relationships were established that will encourage collaborative activities and foster active sharing of weather information.
- Awareness was raised at all levels of the DOT organizations involved, from TMC floor operators and field staff to upper management, of the potential role and value of weather information to enhance the quality and content of traffic operations, and the value of a more proactive stance with regard to managing their systems before, during and after weather events.
Specific accomplishments to each of the TMCs engaged in Phase III are summarized in Table 23.
Implementation Accomplishments |
Anticipated Outcomes and Benefits |
---|---|
Phase II Site: Sacramento RTMC |
|
Based on the self-evaluation process and recognizing the need for quality RWIS weather data, the RTMC recalibrated their RWIS equipment. |
|
Established an initial automated weather alert notification system. |
|
Established policy guidance for operators regarding which DMS to use for alerts coming from various RWIS locations. |
|
Management awareness increased regarding the importance of providing operator training. |
|
Management learned how to fine tune the threshold and interval settings for the weather alerts. |
|
Experience with this initial alert system provided a foundation upon which management understood the need and value of improvements to their system. |
|
Phase III, Tier 1: Kansas City Scout TMC |
|
Demonstrated advance notification of approaching weather events and presented through ATMS to operators as on-screen geo-located polygons. |
|
Facilitated improved working relationships between TMC operations and maintenance |
|
Compiled all possible weather data sources for future integration into their ATMS. |
|
Identified threshold levels for severe weather event triggers, allowing automated road segment specific weather condition alerts within their ATMS. |
|
Assessment of localized weather conditions by expert meteorologists in real time. |
|
Approach developed to incorporate check boxes within ATMS for operators to provide timely reporting of weather event responses. |
|
Phase III, Tier 1: Colorado Springs TMC |
|
Identified new sources of weather information through contacts fostered with CDOT during the self-evaluation process. |
|
The process of identifying the weather information integration strategies and tasks has led to refinements in CSTMC’s Concept of Operations and operating procedures related to weather |
|
Established a plan and schedule for a pilot test of a signal timing plan, guided by weather information, in one of 16 city grid sections. |
|
Phase III, Tier 1: Louisiana Statewide TMC |
|
Working through the Guide made the LATMC aware of the value of identifying and integrating into TMC operations all available weather information sources, such as MAP, State Police, and LSU (their RWIS). |
|
Awareness of the need to standardize policies and procedures to guide the flow of weather information and define weather advisory thresholds. |
|
Prepared a strategy for overcoming DOTD’s reluctance to purchase new RWIS equipment that involves a small scale pilot test demonstration of the value of these systems. |
|
Phase III, Tier 2: Wyoming Statewide TMC |
|
Expanding RWIS coverage throughout state, and multiple corridor RWIS projects. |
|
Expanding vehicle weather data transmission to TMC from plows with AVL/MDC. |
|
Employed a part time, contracted meteorologist as the TMC weather information manager. |
|
Add VSL in four locations and continue to expand in statewide corridors. |
|
Expand and enhance the weather alert notification system in phases. |
|
Expand decision support tools, starting with VSL and moving to DMS recommendations. |
|
7.2 Lessons Learned
A review of the accomplishments achieved so far by the TMCs that have participated in the weather information integration program over the past six years illustrates a number of “success factors,” lessons, and remaining challenges based on these experiences that can be expected to be relevant for any TMC. Various lessons learned have been listed in the prior reports on the earlier phases of this project, and more recently based on the Sacramento RTMC implementation and evaluation of their weather alert notification system (see Section 4). The potential value of lessons from these experiences is tied to creating a wider awareness of the benefits of weather integration and engagement in a process to identify and deploy integration strategies that can improve the operations of TMCs across the country. The ultimate benefits of weather integration are the attainment of the goals of safety, mobility, and satisfaction for the traveling public. Broad lessons, common across each of the TMCs in this study, include the following:
- TMC managers are not generally predisposed to seek out new ways to integrate weather information into their traffic operations, and often they are unaware of weather resources that exist within their broader agency. After participating in the self-evaluation and integration planning process, the TMCs in this study recognized the potential value offered by weather integration, but for the most part required considerable assistance in moving forward to incorporate new ways to integrate weather. Self-motivation sufficient to support achievement of real changes in operations based on weather integration, along with a clear understanding of the steps they needed to take, appears to be rare.
- Resources, both financial and staff, constitute a serious challenge to the successful promotion of weather integration in TMCs. While this point has been made a number of times before, it deserves repeating. This is not just a temporary problem associated with particularly difficult economic conditions in many states. TMC personnel are so stretched to fulfill their daily obligations and tasks, that motivating them to take on a new set of tasks and responsibilities, including modifying policies and procedures to support new ways of operating with weather information, is very difficult. Although TMC managers and operators may agree that enhanced weather integration could help them better meet their operational needs and serve their traveling public, weather integration simply doesn’t represent a high enough priority for them among their many tasks.
- While the weather integration project has focused on enhancing TMC operations, the process depends on teamwork not only within the TMC but also with other agencies and stakeholders. Many, though not all, TMCs have separate structures for their operations and maintenance components. The most effective weather integration implies a seamless sharing of information and decision making across operations and maintenance, but the historical arrangements in TMCs often present major institutional and cultural barriers that hinder information sharing. Engagement in the weather information integration project has helped overcome these barriers where they have existed, but the motivation for TMCs and State DOTs to make that happen is lacking.
In spite of many challenges, the TMCs that have been engaged in the integration project have achieved notable progress, as shown in Table 23 and discussed throughout this report. However, in order to successfully promote and achieve more widespread TMC engagement and accomplishment with weather information integration, a number of additional steps should be considered, as recommended in Section 8.