ITS - Intelligent Transportation Systems Report ITS Home Page

List of Figures and Tables

List of Figures

Figure 2-1 Overview of the Rural Transit Funding, Reporting, and Referral Process in New Mexico
Figure 2-2 Location of Transit Providers in New Mexico
Figure 4-1 Invoicing Timeline
Figure 4-2 Submission Lag before (FY02) and after (FY04) CRRAFT
Figure 4-3 Ratings of the Effect of CRRAFT on Time Preparing Invoices/Reports
Figure 4-4 Ratings of Time Preparing Invoices for All Transit Agencies
Figure 4-5 Ratings for CRRAFT Invoice Preparation Times for (a) Demand Responsive Only and (b) Mixed Route Service Transit Agencies by Number of Trips
Figure 4-6 Ratings of the Effect of CRRAFT on Ability to Submit Invoices by Submission Date
Figure 4-7 Ratings of the Effect of CRRAFT on Invoice Accuracy
Figure 4-8 Percentages of Invoices Needing Corrections
Figure 4-9 Frequency Distribution for Approval Time in FY02 and FY04
Figure 4-10 Ratings of the Effect of CRRAFT on Time Spend Scheduling Demand Response Trips
Figure 4-11 Scheduling time Estimates from "CRRAFT Took Longer" Group
Figure 4-12 Trip Scheduling Time Estimates from "CRRAFT Took Less Time" Group
Figure 4-13 Ratings of Demand Responsive Trip Scheduling Efficiency with CRRAFT
Figure 4-14 Ratingsof the Effect of CRRAFT on Number of Unauthorized Trips
Figure 4-15 Ratings of CRRAFT Impact on Vehicle Breakdowns
Figure 4-16 Ratingsof CRRAFT Impact on Operating Cost
Figure 4-17 Ratingsof CRRAFT Impact on Operating Cost by Number of Trips for Demand Response Transit Agencies
Figure 4-18 Operating Costs
Figure 4-19 Change in Operating Cost and Ridership between FY02 and FY04
Figure 4-20 Operating Cost per Trip in FY02 and FY04
Figure 4-21 Change in Operating Cost and Vehicle Hours Between FY02 and Fy04
Figure 4-22 Transit Agency Ranking of Most Useful CRRAFT Features
Figure 4-23 Transit Agency Ranking of Most Desired Added Features
Figure 4-24 Transit Agency Ranking of Most Desired Improvements
Figure 4-25 Ratings of Overall Opinion of CRRAFT
Figure 4-26 Number of Trips as a Function of Overall Opinion Ratings of CRRAFT
Figure 4-27 Demand Response Number of Trips as a Function of Overall Opinion Ratings of CRRAFT.
Figure 4-28 Ratings of CRRAFT Impact on the Level of Communication Between Agencies
Figure 4-29 Ratings of CRRAFT Impact on Coordination Between Agencies


List of Tables

Table 2-1 Transit Agencies Receiving Funding Through the PTPB and Required to Use CRRAFT in FY04
Table 2-2 CRAAFT Modules and Expected Results
Table 3-1 CRRAFT Expected Outcomes and Preliminary Set of Research Hypotheses
Table 3-2 Summary of Preliminary Assessment Findings
Table 3-3 The Evaluation Approach for the CRRAFT Evaluation
Table 4-1 Average Invoice Preparation Time Ratings by Type of Route
Table 4-2 Summary of Invoices with Problems Before and After CRRAFT
Table 4-3 Average Time (in minutes per day) to Schedule Demand Response Trips Before and After CRRAFT
Table 5-1 Summary of Findings

Table of Contents