List of Figures and Tables
List of Figures
Figure 2-1
Overview of the Rural Transit Funding, Reporting, and Referral Process in New Mexico
Figure 2-2
Location of Transit Providers in New Mexico
Figure 4-1
Invoicing Timeline
Figure 4-2
Submission Lag before (FY02) and after (FY04) CRRAFT
Figure 4-3
Ratings of the Effect of CRRAFT on Time Preparing Invoices/Reports
Figure 4-4
Ratings of Time Preparing Invoices for All Transit Agencies
Figure 4-5
Ratings for CRRAFT Invoice Preparation Times for (a) Demand Responsive Only and (b) Mixed Route Service Transit Agencies by Number of Trips
Figure 4-6
Ratings of the Effect of CRRAFT on Ability to Submit Invoices by Submission Date
Figure 4-7
Ratings of the Effect of CRRAFT on Invoice Accuracy
Figure 4-8
Percentages of Invoices Needing Corrections
Figure 4-9
Frequency Distribution for Approval Time in FY02 and FY04
Figure 4-10
Ratings of the Effect of CRRAFT on Time Spend Scheduling Demand Response Trips
Figure 4-11
Scheduling time Estimates from "CRRAFT Took Longer" Group
Figure 4-12
Trip Scheduling Time Estimates from "CRRAFT Took Less Time" Group
Figure 4-13
Ratings of Demand Responsive Trip Scheduling Efficiency with CRRAFT
Figure 4-14
Ratingsof the Effect of CRRAFT on Number of Unauthorized Trips
Figure 4-15
Ratings of CRRAFT Impact on Vehicle Breakdowns
Figure 4-16
Ratingsof CRRAFT Impact on Operating Cost
Figure 4-17
Ratingsof CRRAFT Impact on Operating Cost by Number of Trips for Demand Response Transit Agencies
Figure 4-18
Operating Costs
Figure 4-19
Change in Operating Cost and Ridership between FY02 and FY04
Figure 4-20
Operating Cost per Trip in FY02 and FY04
Figure 4-21
Change in Operating Cost and Vehicle Hours Between FY02 and Fy04
Figure 4-22
Transit Agency Ranking of Most Useful CRRAFT Features
Figure 4-23
Transit Agency Ranking of Most Desired Added Features
Figure 4-24
Transit Agency Ranking of Most Desired Improvements
Figure 4-25
Ratings of Overall Opinion of CRRAFT
Figure 4-26
Number of Trips as a Function of Overall Opinion Ratings of CRRAFT
Figure 4-27
Demand Response Number of Trips as a Function of Overall Opinion Ratings of CRRAFT.
Figure 4-28
Ratings of CRRAFT Impact on the Level of Communication Between Agencies
Figure 4-29
Ratings of CRRAFT Impact on Coordination Between Agencies
List of Tables
Table 2-1
Transit Agencies Receiving Funding Through the PTPB and Required to Use CRRAFT in FY04
Table 2-2
CRAAFT Modules and Expected Results
Table 3-1
CRRAFT Expected Outcomes and Preliminary Set of Research Hypotheses
Table 3-2
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Findings
Table 3-3
The Evaluation Approach for the CRRAFT Evaluation
Table 4-1
Average Invoice Preparation Time Ratings by Type of Route
Table 4-2
Summary of Invoices with Problems Before and After CRRAFT
Table 4-3
Average Time (in minutes per day) to Schedule Demand Response Trips Before and After CRRAFT
Table 5-1
Summary of Findings
Table of Contents