Integrated Corridor Management Analysis, Modeling,
and Simulation
Experimental Plan for the Test Corridor
You will need the Adobe Reader to view the PDFs on this page.
PDF (913 KB)
March 2008
FHWA-JPO-08-035
EDL 14415
Office of Transportation Management (HOTM)
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
www.fhwa.dot.gov
Table of Contents
Notice and Quality Assurance Statement
Technical Report Documentation Page
3.0 Analysis Scenarios and ICM Strategies
- 3.1 Average- and High-Demand Scenarios
- 3.2 Incident and No-Incident Scenarios
- 3.3 Summary of Analysis Settings
- 3.4 ICM Strategies
List of Tables
Table 3.1 Determining High-Volume Scenario from VMT for Caltrans District 4
Table 3.2 Test Corridor – Summary of Analysis Settings
Table 3.3 Percentages of Days in the Year Categorized by Incident and Demand Levels
Table 3.4 Test Corridor Analysis Scenarios
Table 4.1 Calibration Criteria for the Test Corridor AMS
Table 4.2 Travel Time Calibration Southbound – AM
Table 4.3 Travel Time Calibration Northbound – AM
List of Figures
Figure 2.2 Test Corridor AMS Framework
Figure 2.3 Alameda County Travel Demand Model
Figure 2.4 Mesoscopic Simulation Network for the Test Corridor
Figure 2.5 Microscopic Simulation Network for the Test Corridor
Figure 2.6 Pivot Point Mode Choice Model Application
Figure 2.7 Pivot Point Mode Shift Model – Work Flow
Figure 3.2 Sources of System Variation – Classifying Frequency and Intensity
Figure 3.3 Demand Variation on the Test Corridor
Figure 3.4 Incident Locations/Frequency – Test Corridor NB
Figure 3.5 Incident Locations and Frequency on Test Corridor – Southbound
Figure 3.6 Incident Frequency in the Test Corridor – Southbound
Figure 3.7 Highest Frequency Incident Location in the Test Corridor
Figure 3.8 Incident Duration from PeMS
Figure 3.9 Incident Duration on the Test Corridor
Figure 4.1 DynaSmart-P Calibration – Observed versus Simulated Volumes